The Ever-Changing World In Which We’re Living

Often, when people are living through extraordinary times, they are unaware of just how extraordinary the times in which they’re living are until they are looking back on what was written in the history books.

If this is the new normal, get me out of here. Children are getting strange diseases. Athletes are keeling over. The Queens’ guard at the jubilee was knocked out on the concrete steps. I don’t remember that stuff happening any time before 2020, do you?

Watch Out For Shifting Sands

They said the jabs were experimental and then mandated the population of the planet to be injected. They said kids were not at risk of hospitalization for Covid and then mandated them to get injected because of Omicron. They said the vaccine doesn’t confer immunity from Covid nor does it reduce transmission of Omicron but they insist people must continue to be jabbed three, four, five times, and more. They said VAERS is the official database to track vaccine injuries and deaths but it is under-reported and then they said those numbers are being falsely inflated.

Now, two years later, with no COVID pandemic, they have continued to insist that 6-month-old babies must have these untested mutagenic serums. Meanwhile, for every 1 child “saved” from COVID, there are at least 100 who are killed by the jab. Is there some point where people can do the math here and realize there is much more harm than good coming from these injections? When does our sophisticated first-world Western society begin to demand that these captured bureaucrats and mad scientists be held accountable for all of the blood that’s on their hands?

Or are we expected to continue offering our children on their Satanic altar of sacrifice while they keep calling the shots and orchestrating our peaceful extermination?

---

---

What Does It Matter To You?

I can still remember the cognitive dissonance that I experienced the first time I was blocked from posting something on F-book years ago because the algorithm said the content was “factually inaccurate”. I have to confess, at the time, I didn’t even see it coming. Isn’t social media the place where people share their memes and opinions alongside pictures of their favorite dishes? Since when did people turn to F-book and Tweeter to get factual information? Did I miss something here? Short answer: yes.

You might have guessed it was something to do with the COVID-19 crisis and, in this case, it was specifically pointing out the absurdity of the so-called “mask mandates”. Of course, now everybody just expects to get censored concerning COVID on the big tech social media platforms. At this point, I couldn’t even tell you how many videos of mine have been removed by PoopTube based on COVID censorship, which has resulted in multiple strikes against me and the termination of my channels. The upside of this oppressive and absurd technocratic information tyranny is that it has allowed alternative social media platforms to pop up all over the place and flourish. So, while the light of Truth may have been somewhat diminished, it is far from having been altogether extinguished.

Give The Other Fella Hell

They always give the same excuse to justify their egregious actions and it is always couched in a false moral superiority while they point a blood-drenched finger at you in accusation saying: Your content is in contradiction to the World Health Organization. For information on COVID-19 visit our information center. The implication here is that you must be some sort of insidious moron and the misinformation that you are trying to spread on their platform could potentially kill millions of people.

The reality is that months before the world had ever heard about COVID-19, these big tech social media moguls had already made an agreement with the WHO that they would block and censor anybody who dared to call their pandemic narrative into question. I don’t suppose such a thing could be considered suspicious by anybody unless they were some lunatic fringe conspiracy theorist. Still, there is one more piece to this puzzle not yet mentioned.

Just a few days ago, Zero Hedge reported that the Daily Mail revealed concerns within Western intelligence services about the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where scientists were manipulating coronaviruses sampled from bats in caves nearly 1,000 miles away – the same caves where Covid-19 is suspected to have originated – in April 2020. The worldwide death toll from the Covid pandemic is now estimated to have hit more than 18 million.

The head of the World Health Organization, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, who spent the early months of the pandemic publicly kowtowing to China, has privately admitted that he thinks Covid-19 escaped from a Chinese laboratory in a “catastrophic accident,” according to the Daily Mail, citing a senior Government source. – Tyler Durden, Zero Hedge (June 20, 2022)

So, let me see if I’ve got this right. The SARS-Cov2 novel coronavirus that caused this whole worldwide Covid-19 crisis and was used as the basis to justify a global lockdown followed by an unprecedented warp speed rollout of experimental mutagenic mRNA serums which were coercively injected into billions of people on the planet and then required for employment, travel, and shopping didn’t actually originate from a sick bat sold in a Wuhan wet market but in reality “escaped” from the Wuhan Institute of Virology where the World Health Organization’s Dr. Fauci was funneling U.S. taxpayer money via the NIH and NIAID for illicit coronavirus gain of function research and they knew it the whole time, according to the Chief Director of the WHO?

I never went to J-school or anything but, considering the conservatively tallied 18 million human death toll connected to the virus, I’d think an admission like that ought to make it on the nightly news. Can you think of any reason why it wouldn’t?

License to Kill

The fact that the mRNA vaccine manufacturer Bill Gates-funded World Health Organization has now admitted to lying to the public for years about the origin of their homebrewed novel coronavirus which led to the pandemic (not plandemic, it’s not like they planned it) which led to the warp speed miracle of worldwide mandated mRNA gene therapy so-called vaccine injections, appears to have not changed anything at all. It doesn’t matter if the WHO has admitted to being a dishonest, corrupt, and criminal organization holding humanity hostage for years. Don’t you dare attempt to contradict them or you’ll suffer the consequences!

The reason of course is because the stakes are so high. You can’t be allowed to just run your mouth and spout off a bunch of half-baked conspiracy theories in a public forum these days, why you could kill millions of people with rhetoric like that! It’s for the Greater Good after all. Now, roll up that sleeve (again) and this time bring your baby.

Climate Change Control

Far be it from me to lecture and proselytize to the populations of Earth how it is their social responsibility that they must do their part for the greater good of all, but even more dangerous to our collective future as a species than wiping out the human race with a novel cold virus is the threat that we all face due to climate change. Just try contradicting the man-made global warming narrative on F-book and see what happens. Censored again!

That makes sense, right? I mean, if you start questioning this belief that you are socially responsible for destroying the planet you’re going to destroy the planet! And then where are we all supposed to live? You didn’t think of that, did you? Of course not, you’re a selfish little dirty useless eater idiot slave and it’s all your fault for jumping in your busy hamster wheel every day and using up the Earth’s finite resources so you can breed more pestilent slave babies. Now somebody’s going to have to make sure you pay for it…

This Means War!

The danger is clear. The threat is imminent. Time is running out. Now, more than ever, it is urgent that we take action to prevent climate change. We are certain that if we are able to remove all of the CO2 greenhouse gases from Earth’s atmosphere then we will be successful in preventing a change in the climate. It’s going to take a lot of teamwork between the private and public sectors but you, dear human citizens of Earth, must do your part to diminish your carbon footprint, become carbon neutral, and end your CO2 emissions if we are ever going to be successful in preventing climate change.

Hold it there just a minute, Your Excellencies. Us earthlings over here and the plants and the animals of the Earth that sustain us are all carbon-based life forms. You see, I don’t have a private jet or a private jet that I fly in a private jet to attend some exclusive conference with others who are likewise convinced they were conferred at birth with the divine right of kings which entitles them to make decisions for other people, I’m just a simple guy whose lived in the country his whole life. I don’t have $1,000 lunches or mansion estates with a full-time staff but I do have a garden. The thing about greenhouses is that people build them and put them in their gardens for pretty much only one reason: it makes the garden grow.

Now, I’ll admit I don’t live in a palace in the city. I live in a simple home with a little land on a hillside that my grandparents bought way back in 1964. It’s not much but it’s all that I need and, aside from tending to the animals or my garden, I’ve always got some work that needs to be done outside here. So, I don’t know what life is like living in a modern urban environment but, from my humble point of view, I’ve noticed Nature has a certain rhythm she keeps. She always leads the dance and I follow.

I understand that the plants and the trees that surround me all day are living, breathing creatures of consciousness. When they exhale, I inhale and when I exhale, they inhale. I feed them for a season and they feed me for a season. We work in tandem each one supporting the life of the other. Without the oxygen they exhale, I would perish. Without the CO2 that I exhale, they would perish.

I’m well aware of how dangerous it is for me to ask any questions about the viability of these ever-increasing royal edicts these days, but this story about carbon emissions, carbon credits, carbon crimes, carbon taxes, and such just sounds like a weak excuse to trick me into slavery because I get lost at the part where you expect me to believe that suffocating the plants is good for the planet. If I understand it correctly, the stated goal here is preventing climate change, or “man-made global warming”, right? Can you explain to me one more time how you’ve come to the conclusion that removing the “greenhouse” gas of life on Earth from the atmosphere of Earth is supposed to prevent climate change and not cause it?

The Brontosaurus in the Room

There’s another aspect of this story that just isn’t adding up for me either, and that is this business about “fossil fuels”. The criminal Biden cartel that currently has America under siege is leaning pretty heavily on forcing a transition away from our “fossil fuel-based economy” to a new economy that is dependent on “renewable energy”. So, of course, the first thing the illegitimate Biden regime had to do was cut off the domestic production of oil and gas. Next, tap the oil reserves (on reserve for the people who paid for it, that is Biden’s puppet master’s enemy the U.S. taxpayer), and send it overseas to cover up for the fact that now they’ve created a worldwide energy shortage. Finally, tell the people how lucky they are because at least they’re not paying as much as the Germans do to fill their tank.

You’re on board, right? It’s what you wanted, isn’t it? After all, we’ve got to stop using “fossil fuels” because it’s not a renewable resource (I mean, how many dinosaur bones turning into oil can there be on the planet?) and also plus don’t forget how evil it is because it’s putting so much CO2 in our atmosphere. But, what if oil and gas didn’t come from dinosaurs? And, what if more CO2 in our atmosphere grows more plant life?

Oil and natural gas do not come from fossilized dinosaurs! Thus, they are not fossil fuels. That’s a myth. According to Wikipedia, the term “fossil fuel” was first used by German chemist Caspar Neumann in 1759. It was subsequently used more ubiquitously in the early 1900s to give people the idea that petroleum, coal, and natural gas come from ancient living things, making them natural substances.

An article by Bob Strauss on ThoughtCo.com notes that Sinclair Oil Corp. sponsored a dinosaur at the Chicago World’s Fair “on the premise that the world’s oil reserves were formed during the Mesozoic era when the dinosaurs lived. The exhibit was so popular that Sinclair promptly adopted a big, green brontosaurus . . . as its official mascot,” writes Strauss.

Petroleum, natural gas, and coal come from biomass, primarily from plankton and decaying marine organisms, and “single-celled bacteria” that “evolved in the Earth’s oceans about three billion years ago.” Over millions of years, layers of sediment built up, along with plants (plankton and algae) and bacteria. Heat and pressure began to rise. The degree of heat and the amount of pressure, along with the type of biomass, determine if the material becomes petroleum or natural gas. – Clare Goldsberry, “Sorry, folks, oil does not come from dinosaurs” April 16, 2019

Well, you heard it here first folks! We can finally say that we no longer use fossil fuels in the production of oil and gas, looks like it’s renewable after all. Plus, there’s the extra bonus of how the added CO2 emissions in the atmosphere which result from its use actually contribute to blooming algae colonies in the oceans, which then create more biomass for fuel. Isn’t Mother Nature amazing when the United Nations isn’t fucking with her? It’s nice to have some good news once in a while!

Did you happen to catch that bit about how the term “fossil fuels” was used ubiquitously in the early 1900s “to give people the idea” that petroleum, coal, and natural gas came from dinosaurs? I’m no expert on behavioral psychology or anything, but when you knowingly lie to people in order to manipulate their perception, isn’t that usually for some purpose of control? And, isn’t it a behavior that would be considered abusive?

Just another day at the office for the early 1900s big oil magnate John D. Rockefeller and Standard Oil, it seems. But, if our masters of global government at the United Nations no longer allowed us to use petroleum for energy, would they also prohibit their pharmaceutical benefactors from using petroleum to manufacture pills and miracle vaccines? Don’t worry your doomed little slave head about it, your thoughts will be replaced by the AI hive mind soon enough.

---